SEO KISS

25 Sep 2007 at 08:54 by Joshua J. Steimle

No, it's not a new cover band of SEO professionals wearing makeup, it's just my way of saying that getting results from search engine optimization doesn't have to be that hard--keep it simple, stupid.

What I mean is that as I frequent SEO websites and read the SEO blogs I see a lot of very detailed discussions about the science of search engines, how they work, and how you can refine your SEO strategy down to the tiniest aspects. But when it comes to making money as an SEO firm, how important is it to stay up to date on all these tiny details?

Sure, it's fun to know all the little secrets, and it certainly doesn't hurt unless you become so obsessed with the minutiae that you ignore the big stuff, but when the vast majority of the potential market is doing ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in the way of SEO, I have to wonder if us SEO professionals are getting way ahead of the game.

Maybe your situation is different than mine. Perhaps you have clients in a hyper-competitive industry and every little difference counts. Most of my clients are such that I can go in and tweak some title tags, clean up their code, write some content, recruit a few backlinks, and within a few weeks they've shot up in the rankings and start getting real results. I don't have to dig into the latest and greatest techniques, I can focus on the very simple aspects of SEO that have been well-known for years, and in most cases that gets the job done.

This doesn't mean I ignore what's going on and I'm not saying you can ignore the websites, blogs, and message boards talking about everything SEO. There's no telling when something I'm doing might turn out to be wrong and I need to know that as soon as possible. There's no telling when some new tool might come out that makes my job easier. All I'm saying is that for most of the clients I see, keeping it simple is better until such time as their industry really gets on board with SEO and more sophisticated approaches are called for. And I guess the other thing I'm saying is that I think there is a hugely underserved market out there of small-time clients who could benefit from very simple SEO techniques provided at low cost, but so many of us seem focused on getting the higher-end clients that I think we're missing out on the larger opportunity.

digg digg it!  delicious, mmm Add to del.icio.us

Comments

Post a comment




(you may use HTML tags for style)

Recent SEO Articles

Why Google Shouldn't Discriminate Against Paid Links

21 Apr 2008 at 14:58 by Joshua J. Steimle

Because it can't accurately identify them. Frankly, I don't have much against Google having something against paid links. It's their search engine, they can do whatever they want with it. Of course I'd prefer they live and let live when it comes to paid links, for my own self-interest as someone who occasionally uses paid links as a way to build incoming links for my SEO clients.

But the problem is there's no way for Google--I should say "no effective way"--to differentiate between a paid link and one that isn't paid for.

The SEO Con Artists

17 Apr 2008 at 09:31 by Joshua J. Steimle

A real description of an SEO firm on an SEO directory:

Full service 1-on-1 SEO marketing since 1996. Check out comprised month-to-month packages at SEOgame.com (Eg. $375 package will start out at 2,220 manual directories and 550 manual article directory submissions) Manual submission services will provide permanent 1-way links and include 3 project managers and 17 site submitters to get the job done right with lots of worrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrk! Get to the top of the in less than a month for your top keywords today.

If you're shopping for SEO services and you hear this type of pitch, you might figure "Hey, it's only $375 and maybe I'll get something out of it even though it sounds too good to be true." But what you should be thinking is "For $375 I could take my wife out for a really, really nice night on the town, and the ROI would be higher to boot."

Fixing Other SEO Firms' Mistakes Using Dreamweaver Wildcard Search and Replace

20 Feb 2008 at 18:31 by Joshua J. Steimle

All too often we take over search engine optimization efforts for a new client, only to find that the last SEO firm or SEO professional they were using did so many things wrong it's going to be a major effort just to clean up their mess, let alone start making progress (although I suppose cleaning up is a form of progress, but you know what I mean).

Case in point, we just took over doing SEO for a billion-dollar enterprise with a substantial website, and what do you know, the last SEO people working on it stuffed the site full of stuffed image alt tags, stuffed keyword meta tags, stuffed url title tags, etc. And they were very thorough with their work in that they didn't repeat the content of the various tags, they mixed it up in every case so they aren't the same and therefore you can't do a simple search and replace to find them all. The slow way to get things done would be to edit every page by hand, deleting the offending code, but thankfully Dreamweaver lets you do a wildcard search and replace that is a lifesaver.

Organic SEO Articles >>